In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>Maybe companies such as Intel, IBM, and Sun would devote resources to
>optimizing Python on their hardware if the language had an ISO
>standard, as do C, C++, and Fortran, and were less of a moving target.
>OTOH, that could slow the development of the language.
>
>I have wondered why the "dynamic" languages such as Perl and Python
>tend not to have ISO standards.
>
There's a LOT to say on the subjects you raise. It might be a while
before anyone with a background in the appropriate areas tackles them.
Perhaps we'll return to this ...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
