Duncan Booth wrote:
[...]
is equivalent to:
x = x.__iadd__(1)
thx all for answers and hints ...
Generating hundreds of threads is, BTW, a very good way to get poor
performance on any system. Don't do that. Create a few threads and put the
actions for those threads into a Queue. If you want the threads to execute
in parallel investigate using sub-processes.
I know that limitation. However I am bridging to existing software which
is hard to be changed. and on powerful machine I have at hand it works
quite fast.
The threading module already has a function to return the number of Thread
objects currently alive.
I have threads within threads - so it does not suit me :-(.
--
Andy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
