On 10 Mar 2005 12:35:36 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Roger, > > I didn't realize that Stefan replied to the list and sent a private > email reply. There seemed to be a lag in google groups today. I > basically told him that I might be crazy enough to write an assembler > in python, but I'm not crazy enough to start using those function > decorators. > > I'm working more on the backend stuff now but I was considering adding > the hook. I never realized that you couldn't use string interpolation > on a docstring, so that's probably the showstopper. I don't want to > take that functionality away. > > I was thinking that the decorator could cheat and just swallow the > originating docstring when returning the assembly function. > Introspection based tools (which I'm assuming epydoc is) would only see > the new docstrings on the assembly function. Not that I have docstring > functionality built in yet but it's on the todo list. Size also isn't > an issue because I'm currently using a string anyway. But lack of > string interpolation is an issue.
Have you seen PyPy? They already have the ability to turn a native python function into pyrex and compile it on the fly. Stephen. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
