On Jan 16, 11:06 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hendrik van Rooyen wrote: > > "Dan" <the,,,ail.com> wrote: > > >> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q)) > > >> Needs to be > >> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver, (port_q,kbd_q)) > > >> Commas are important! > > >> -Dan > > > Absolutely! - well spotted! > > > As the first correct respondent, you win the freedom to spend a week in > > Naboomspruit at your own expense. > > > It would have been nice, however, to have gotten something like: > > > TypeError - This routine needs a tuple. > > > instead of the silent in line calling of the routine in question, > > while failing actually to start a new thread. > > You can't prevent the silent inline-calling - otherwise, how would you do > this: > > def compute_thread_target(): > def target(): > pass > return target > > thread.start_new_thread(compute_thread_target()) > > Of course start_new_thread could throw an error if it got nothing callable > as first argument. No idea why it doesn't. > > Diez
Of course, in his case, having start_new_thread throw an error wouldn't have helped, since he went into an infinite loop while evaluating the parameters for start_new_thread. Would it be possible to have pychecker (or some such) warn that there is an insufficient parameter count to start_new_thread? I guess that would require knowing the type of thread. . . -Dan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
