Cristian a écrit :
> On Sep 21, 5:21 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, then what about classes ? They also are objects-like-any-other,
>> after all. So should we have this syntax too ?
>>
>> MyClass = class(ParentClass):
>> __init__ = function (self, name):
>> self.name = name
>>
>> ?-)
>
> For consistency I would suggest this, but Python already does this!
>
> Foo = type('Foo', (object, ), {'bar': lambda self, bar: bar})
>
> I've created a new class and then binded it to name afterwards. If you
> can import modules without special syntax and you can create classes
> without special syntax, why should functions be treated any
> differently?
>
You already can create functions without using the def statement:
Help on class function in module __builtin__:
class function(object)
| function(code, globals[, name[, argdefs[, closure]]])
|
| Create a function object from a code object and a dictionary.
| The optional name string overrides the name from the code object.
| The optional argdefs tuple specifies the default argument values.
| The optional closure tuple supplies the bindings for free variables.
|
HTH
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
