Carl Banks wrote:
transformations gets rebound, so you'd need a reference to it.
That certainly is an application. I guess it depends on one's
programming background.
I'd only use nested (function, class) definition to accomplish
such a feature:
########################
def genclass(x,y):
class myclass:
M = x
def f(self, z):
return self.M + y + z
return myclass
A=genclass(1,2)
a=A()
#########################
where i would prefer python to expand this as a template to:
class myclass:
M = 1
def f(self, z):
return self.M + 2 + z
A = myclass
a = A()
IOW, I'd like nested (function, class) definitions to
be used *only* for dynamic code generation with runtime
constants, and OOP *forced* for other applications like
the fractal example:)
jf
---------------
# if you're dissatisfied with the situation on the planet
# slow down the circulation of money
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
