Terry Hancock wrote: > And, well, I'm sorry Mr. Lundh, but your PIL module actually is something > of a pain to install still. The OP is right about that. Usually worth it, > but I don't > like the fact that that pain is being passed on to the end-user of my > software. > > The fact that you got all snide and refused to work with me when I asked > for a copy of the autoconf sources to try to fix the problem didn't make me > too happy, either.
ah, you're the guy who flamed me and called me names because PIL didn't fit some hypothetical GNU-inspired definition of "open source software." it's always sad when people have to attack those who don't share their religion, but it's not that much I can do about that. > So, naturally, I just dropped it. which means that you have no idea how easy or hard it is to install PIL today (hint: things have changed) </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
