On 22 November 2017 at 20:33, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 22 November 2017 at 20:05, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jelle Zijlstra < >>> jelle.zijls...@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>> 2017-11-22 9:58 GMT-08:00 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>: >>>> >>> (OTOH, await in the same position must keep working since it's not >>>> broken and not unintuitive either.) >>>> >>> >>> >> >> This is very questionable IMO. >> So do you think that [await x for y in z] and list(await x for y in z) >> being not equivalent is intuitive? >> > > I see, that's why this is such a long thread. :-( > > But are they different? I can't find an example where they don't give the > same outcome. > > I think this is a minimal example https://bugs.python.org/issue32113 Also Yury explains there why [await x for y in z ] is different from list(await x for y in z). Although I understand why it works this way, TBH it is not very intuitive. -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
