On Sep 16, 2017, at 02:39, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote:

> I'm not proposing that we allow arbitrary expressions as decorators... well, 
> I'm not doing that yet at least.  But like I said, the syntax has been this 
> way for 13 years and I don't recall anybody complaining.

Indeed, I can’t remember a single time where I’ve needed that, let alone 
actually realized the restriction existed.  But now that you mention it, I do 
remember discussions in favor of the more restricted syntax when the feature 
was originally being debated.  I don’t remember the reasons though - it well 
could have been an abundance of caution over how far to take the new syntax 
(and understanding of course that it’s easier to relax than restrict).

-Barry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to