funny ; this made me think of this talk; https://youtu.be/OSGv2VnC0go?t=1013
Éric Lafontaine | Membre du Projet VUE, Groupe Contrôle Génie électrique, 54ème promotion UdeS | Étudiant en maitrise TI à l'ETS VAS OPS chez Bell Mobility « Nous voulons proposer une alternative de transport en présentant un véhicule électrique spécifiquement conçu pour les déplacements urbains. » 2017-07-27 15:19 GMT-04:00 MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com>: > On 2017-07-27 03:34, Mike Miller wrote: > >> >> >> On 2017-07-26 16:36, MRAB wrote: >> >>> "nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't. >>> >> >> Whenever I've used the for-else, I've put a # no-break right next to it, >> to >> remind myself as much as anyone else. >> >> for...: not break: is the best alternative I've yet seen, congrats. >> Perhaps in >> Python 5 it can be enabled, with for-else: used instead for empty >> iterables, as >> that's what I expected the first few dozen times. >> >> For empty iterables, how about "elif None:"? :-) > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eric. > lafontaine1%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
