On 10 December 2016 at 10:15, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 12/10/2016 4:05 AM, David Mertz wrote: >> >> I'm forwarding this to the PSF Trademarks committee. If there is a >> violation, it's a misuse of trademark, not copyright on the code which >> has the Python license stack. > > > I believe that this 'derived work' is both a trademark and a license > violation. Clause 7 of the PSF License V. 2, as displayed by '>>> > license()', explicitly denies permission to make derivative works that > violate PSF Trademarks. Perhaps Github and Infoworld should be informed > also, but our lawyer can decide. > > "This License Agreement does not grant permission to use PSF > trademarks ..." > > Perhaps that document should mention somewhere at the top that "Python" is a > PSF Trademark for computer languages.
Someone has raised an issue against the project at https://github.com/naftaliharris/python2.8/issues/47 We should probably see what the project owner's response to that is. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
