There are a number of ways to make it work (mostly). However, I'll defer to Raymond on how strictly OrderedDict should "subclass" from dict.
-eric On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:26 AM, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:02 PM, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Oleg Broytman <p...@phdru.name> wrote: >>>> (if a PEP is needed at all) >>> >>> I don't think so. My PEP is not for changing Python Language, >>> just describe implementation detail. >>> >>> Python 3.5 has new OrderedDict implemented in C without PEP. >>> My patch is relatively small than it. And the idea has been well known. >> >> How about, for 3.6, target re-implementing OrderedDict using the >> compact dict approach (and leave dict alone for now). That way we >> have an extra release cycle to iron out the kinks before switching >> dict over for 3.7. :) >> >> -eric > > I can't. Since OrderedDict inherits dict. OrderedDict implementation > based on dict > implementation. > Since I'm not expert of Python object system, I don't know how to > separate OrderedDict > implementation from dict. > > > -- > INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
