A better place for this question would be the tulip Google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-tulip
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:05 AM, cr0hn <cr...@cr0hn.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > It's the first time I write in this list. Sorry if it's not the best place > for this question. > > After I read the Asyncio's documentation, PEPs, Guido/Jesse/David Beazley > articles/talks, etc, I developed a PoC library that mixes: Process + > Threads + Asyncio Tasks, doing an scheme like this diagram: > > main -> Process 1 -> Thread 1.1 -> Task 1.1.1 > -> Task 1.1.2 > -> Task 1.1.3 > > -> Thread 1.2 > -> Task 1.2.1 > -> Task 1.2.2 > -> Task 1.2.3 > > Process 2 -> Thread 2.1 -> Task 2.1.1 > -> Task 2.1.2 > -> Task 2.1.3 > > -> Thread 2.2 > -> Task 2.2.1 > -> Task 2.2.2 > -> Task 2.2.3 > > In my local tests, this approach appear to improve (and simplify) the > concurrency/parallelism for some tasks but, before release the library at > github, I don't know if my aproach is wrong and I would appreciate your > opinion. > > Thank you very much for your time. > > Regards! > > -- > Daniel García a.k.a. cr0hn - Security researcher and pentester > @ggdaniel > http://www.cr0hn.com/me/ > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
