On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:17 AM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
> Please be respectful rather than inflammatory. If you read what I > wrote, I did not say that I was going to stop contributing, I > specifically talked about that gut reaction being both emotional and > illogical. That doesn't make the reaction any less real, and the fact > that such reactions exist is a data point you should consider in > conducting your PR campaign for this issue. (I don't mean that last as > a negative: this issue *requires* an honest PR campaign.) > Well, my own reactions at this point in the flame war are also quite emotional. :-( I have done my best in being honest in my PR campaign. But I feel like the opposition (not you, but definitely some others -- have you seen Twitter?) are spreading FUD based on an irrational conviction that this will destroy Python. It will not. It may not prove the solution to all Python's problems -- there's always 3.6. (Oh wait, Python 2.7 is perfect. I've heard that before -- Paul Everitt famously said the same of Python 1.5.2. Aren't you glad I didn't take him literally? :-P ) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
