On 3/12/2015 10:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:37:16 +0000
> "Loevborg, Soeren Jakob" <soeren.j.loevb...@siemens.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> import ipaddress
>>>>> ipaddress.IPv4Interface('10.0.0.1/8') + 1
>> IPv4Interface('10.0.0.2/32')
>>>>> ipaddress.IPv6Interface('fd00::1/64') + 1
>> IPv6Interface('fd00::2/128')
>
> Given that the behaviour is unlikely to match any use case, I'd say
> it's a bug.
Agreed.
> Related issue:
>
>>>> ipaddress.IPv4Interface('10.0.0.255/8') + 1
> IPv4Interface('10.0.1.0/32')
>
> Should the result be IPv4Interface('10.0.0.0/8')
> (i.e. wrap around)? Should OverflowError be raised?
I think it should be an OverflowError. 10.0.1.0/8 makes no sense, and
10.0.0.0/8 is unlikely to be desirable.
--
Eric.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
