On 22.11.13 00:53, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:43:37 -0500
Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:

On Nov 21, 2013, at 06:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:

As usual, 'I am not a lawyer', but if Christian wants to push forward with
using 'Python 2.8', I suggest that he consult the PSF Trademark Committee and
lawyer first.
Just to make clear, I'm definitely *not* suggesting this particular case ever
escalate to such a level.  Chris is our friend and a nice guy. :)

I'm just saying that I think we should avoid any possible confusion on the
part of ours (and Stackless's) users.  And based on the discussions here,
there are plenty of good alternatives.
+1 from me :-)

Thank you for that input! It was important and urgent, as I saw myself jumping
into the wrong wagon, again.

--
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>
Software Consulting          :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776  fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to