On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:29 AM, A.M. Kuchling <a...@amk.ca> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:34:05AM +0200, tim.peters wrote: >> Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ;-) >> - # else it's a negative timeout - precise behavior isn't documented >> - # then, but historically .join() returned in this case >> + else: >> + # the behavior of a negative timeout isn't documented, but >> + # historically .join() has acted as if timeout=0 then > > I think the final 'then' on the new comment is an editing error. > Unless perhaps you meant to write a further sentence of comment?
Reads OK to me. Read "then" as an abbreviation of "in that case"? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
