On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Paul Moore wrote: > On 12 October 2013 01:53, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > t's easy to mix up PEP numbers. For example, Martin von Loewis wrote > > two major PEP related to Unicode: 383 and 393. These numbers are > > close, only one digit is different. It's worse when you discuss recent > > PEPs: PEP 445 or PEP 454? Oops, no it was the PEP 455. > > I think that the real issue is that people expect others to remember > numbers as easily as they do while writing emails, etc. If in email > people refer to PEPs as PEP 302 (Import Hooks) or PEP 3156 (Tulip) or > PEP 435 (Enum) etc, there would be a lot less issue.
+1 -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
