On Oct 11, 2013, at 09:24 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >I don't think that this contextlib.ignore() thing has been discussed a >lot. > >Ezio was -1 on the tracker, and Eric Smith was -0. I'd like to add my >-1 too. This is a useless addition (the traditional idiom is perfectly >obvious) and makes reading foreign code more tedious by adding >superfluous API calls. > >Please consider reverting. There is absolutely zero use case for this >that wasn't already solved by the traditional "except ...: pass" idiom.
I'm +0; I think it's a nice little addition that could be useful, but I don't care enough to wait for 3.4 to delete similar code in a my own programs. To bikeshed though: why was `ignored` changed to `ignore`? The former reads better to me, and I don't think *that* particular change was discussed at all in the tracker afaict. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
