On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:59:05 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It sounds like a reasonable approach to me. > > In terms of naming, would you consider "concurrent.asyncio"? When we > created that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested > submodules discussed was the standard event loop API.
-10. Please, let's stop it. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
