On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 16:14:24 +0300 Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > 15.09.13 14:23, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): > > On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:56:26 +0900 > > Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > >> On 09/14/2013 07:30 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:33:56 +0900 > >>> Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > >>>> Whenever I read a discussion about the dict, I always wonder whether the > >>>> same thing applies to a set. Have you considered the utility of a > >>>> TransformSet? Or is it YAGNI? > >>> Well, a TransformSet is like a normal dict, you just need to call the > >>> transformation function yourself when inserting the keys. > >> > >> s/normal dict/normal set/ > > > > No, read my example. > > A TransformDict is like a normal dict, you just need to call the > transformation function yourself when inserting the keys and insert a > pair of (orig_key, value), or is like two normal dicts, you just need to > call the transformation function yourself when inserting the keys and > update parallel mapping from transformed keys to original keys.
I don't really care. What's the point in the end? TransformDict is non-trivial to implement, while the so-called "TransformSet" is just a dict with a different API. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
