Eli Bendersky writes: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <step...@xemacs.org> > wrote:
>> FWIW, as somebody who can recall using ET exactly once, >> IncrementalParser is what I used. > Just to be on the safe side, I want to make sure that you indeed > mean IncrementalParser, which was committed 4 months ago into the > Mercurial default branch (3.4) and has only seen an alpha release? > Eli Oops, and thank you for your courtesy. No, actually looking at the code this time, I meant xml.sax.xmlreader.IncrementalParser, which has the same API as the new etree.ElementTree.IncrementalParser. No wonder it seems familiar. As for the suggestion, AIUI, you proposed keeping the current layering of iterparse on top of IncrementalParser, and then removing Incrementalparser from the documentation. My suggestion is to rename the current "IncrementalParser" class, and then use the IncrementalParser interface for what is currently named "iterparse". Assuming that, as Stefan claims, data_received == feed, and so on. Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
