[Tim, wondering why the 3.2 branch isn't "inactive"] [Georg Brandl] > FWIW I have no real objections, I just don't see the gain.
I'm glad it's OK! Especially because it's already been done ;-) Two gains: 1. "hg branches" output now matches what the developer docs imply it should be. It didn't before. 2. If a security fix needs to made to 3.2, it will be much easier to forward-merge it to the 3.3 and default branches now (the merges won't suck in a pile of ancient, and unwanted, irrelevant-to-the-fix changes). _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
