On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:05:40 -0700 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, the status quo of Idle is not something we should allow to > continue indefinitely, but decisions about its future development > should be made by active maintainers that are already trusted to make > changes to it (such as Terry and Roger), rather than those of us that > don't use it, and aren't interested in maintaining it.
Definitely. People shouldn't remain quiescently torpid about the idle status quo. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
