On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I don't disagree that he shouldn't have cross-posted. I was just >> pointing out that the language should be clarified. What's confusing >> is that the current language implies that one shouldn't send any >> PEP-related e-mails to any mailing list other than peps@. In >> particular, how can one discuss PEPs on python-dev or python-ideas >> without violating that language (e.g. this e-mail which is related to >> PEP 1)? It is probably just a matter of clarifying what "PEP-related" >> means. > > > I'm just not seeing the confusion, sorry. And we have never really had any > confusion over this wording before. If you want to send a patch to tweak the > wording to me more clear then please go ahead and I will consider it, but > I'm not worried enough about it to try to come up with some rewording > myself.
I uploaded a proposed patch to this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue16746 --Chris _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
