Brett Cannon wrote:


On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com <mailto:ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org
    <mailto:br...@python.org>> wrote:
     > It would also be very easy to expand importlib.abc.SourceLoader
    to add a
     > method which is called with source and returns the bytecode to be
    written
     > out

    Yes, please.  Not having to hack around this would be nice.


http://bugs.python.org/issue15627

AST transformation is a lot more general than just optimization.

Adding an AST transformation is a relatively painless way to add to
Python the last element of lisp-ness that it lacks:
Namely being able to treat code as data and transform it at runtime,
after parsing but before execution.

Some examples:
Profiling code be added by an AST transformation.
IMO this would have been a more elegant way to implement CProfile
and similar profilers than the current approach.

AST transformations allow DSLs to be implemented in Python
(I don't know if that is a + or - ).

Access to the AST of a function at runtime would also be of use to
method-based dynamic optimizers, or dynamic de-optimizers for static
compilers.

All for the price of adding a single method to SourceLoader.
What a bargain :)

Cheers,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to