On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: >> On Aug 02, 2012, at 03:04 PM, nick.coghlan wrote: >> >>>-module. Specifically, any module that contains an ``__path__`` attribute is >>>+module. Specifically, any module that contains a ``__path__`` attribute is >> >> I find this change hilarious! Is it "an under-under path" or "a dunder >> path"? > > Personally, I just say "path" (same with __init__, __main__, etc) and > rely on context.
Yup. That's why I would write "a __path__ attribute", but "an __init__ method". If I have to be explicit when speaking, I'll typically say either "dunder <whatever>" or "double underscore <whatever>". I find that's only needed if there is a name class between the double underscore name and a non-prefixed variable though, which doesn't happen very often. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
