Am 29.05.2012 01:15, schrieb mar...@v.loewis.de: >> Comments welcome, especially on whether Windows users agree that >> something like this is needed in the absence of PEP 397 in Python 3.3. > > AFAICT, there is no need to check in the binary into revision control. > Instead, the Windows build process should create, package, and deploy > them, and venv should then just expect that they are there. > > So I request that this checkin is reverted, preferably before the alpha > release. > > I also agree with the fundamental principle that an open source project > should never ever include binaries for which it doesn't also provide > source code. If you cannot release the sources right now, do not release > the binaries either.
Agreed. Vinay, please either let me know when this is rectified (see also Nick's request about reverting #12394 specific parts of the commit), or revert the whole PEP 405 implementation for now, if the time is too short: I don't want to delay the alpha much longer. There is still time until beta after all. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
