On Apr 10, 2012 2:36 AM, "Terry Reedy" <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > > On 4/9/2012 9:13 AM, r.david.murray wrote: >> >> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eff551437abd >> changeset: 76176:eff551437abd >> user: R David Murray<rdmur...@bitdance.com> >> date: Mon Apr 09 08:55:42 2012 -0400 >> summary: >> #14533: if a test has no test_main, use loadTestsFromModule. >> >> This moves us further in the direction of using normal unittest facilities >> instead of specialized regrtest ones. Any test module that can be correctly >> run currently using 'python unittest -m test.test_xxx' can now be converted to >> use normal unittest test loading by simply deleting its test_main, thus no >> longer requiring manual maintenance of the list of tests to run. > > ... >> >> + if __name__ == '__main__': >> + unittest.main() >> >> - if __name__ == '__main__': >> - test_main() > > > Being on Windows, I sometimes run single tests interactively with > > from test import test_xxx as t; t.test_main() > > Should t.unittest.main(t.__name__) work as well? > Should this always work even if there is still a test_main? Both questions have the same answer. Yes, because this is how discovery works. > > tjr > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anacrolix%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
