I see that I've misunderstood this entirely, nevermind me.
--Brett
On 08/03/12 14:48, Brett Wilkins wrote:
> I assume when you say "non-string keys" this includes numbers.
>
> But in Pypy, I can certainly use numbers:
>>>> {'1':1, 1:2}.keys()
> ['1', 1]
>
> I can even use a lambda (obviously not a string, a number, nor what I
> would consider a primitive):
>>>> {'1':1, (lambda x: x):2}.keys()
> ['1', <function <lambda> at 0x00007fdb0b837da8>]
>
> These are in Pypy 1.8.
>
> --Brett
>
> On Thu 08 Mar 2012 14:39:40 NZDT, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> During the Language Summit 2011 (*), it was discussed that PyPy and
>> Jython don't support non-string key in type dict. An issue was open to
>> emit a warning on such dict, but the patch has not been commited yet.
>>
>> I'm trying to Lib/test/crashers/losing_mro_ref.py: I wrote a patch
>> fixing the specific issue (keep a strong reference to the MRO during
>> the lookup, see #14199), but I realized that the real problem is that
>> we allow custom objects in the type dict.
>>
>> So my question is: what is the use case of such dict? Why do we still
>> support it? Can't we simply raise an error if the dict contains
>> non-string keys?
>>
>> (*) http://blog.python.org/2011/03/2011-language-summit-report.html
>>
>> Victor
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-Dev mailing list
>> Python-Dev@python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>> Unsubscribe:
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40brett.geek.nz
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
