> I think you should provide stronger arguments in each case why the > data needs to be truly immutable or read-only, rather than just using > a convention or an "advisory" API (like __private can be circumvented > but clearly indicates intent to the reader).
I only know one use case for "truly immutable or read-only" object (frozendict, "read-only" type, read-only proxy, etc.): security. I know three modules using a C extension to implement read only objects: zope.proxy, zope.security and mxProxy. pysandbox uses more ugly tricks to implement read-only proxies :-) Such modules are used to secure web applications for example. A frozendict type doesn't replace these modules but help to implement security modules. http://www.egenix.com/products/python/mxBase/mxProxy/ http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.proxy http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.security Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
