On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:36 -0500 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2012, at 09:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > >So I do not support the __preview__ package. I think we're better off > >flagging experimental modules in the docs than in their name. For the > >specific case of the regex module, the best way to adoption may just > >be to include it in the stdlib as regex and keep it there. Any other > >solution will just cause too much anxiety. > > +1 > > What does the PEP give you above this "simple as possible" solution?
"I think we'll just see folks using the unstable APIs and then complaining when we remove them, even though they *know* *upfront* that these APIs will go away." That problem would be much worse if some modules were simply marked "experimental" in the doc, rather than put in a separate namespace. You will see people copying recipes found on the internet without knowing that they rely on unstable APIs. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
