On 25/11/2011 15:48, Paul Moore wrote:
On 25 November 2011 15:07, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc<amaur...@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/11/25 Paul Moore<p.f.mo...@gmail.com>
It would be nice to have the optimisation back if it's easy enough to
do so, for quick-and-dirty code, but it is not a good idea to rely on
it (and it's especially unwise to base benchmarks on it working :-))
Note that this string optimization hack is still present in Python 3,
but it now acts on *unicode* strings, not bytes.
Ah, yes. That makes sense.
Although for concatenating immutable bytes presumably the same hack
would be *possible*.
Michael
Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
