On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
> I personally strongly prefer the one-line formula to the hardcoded magic
> numbers calculated from the formula. I find it much more readable. To me,
> the only justification for the switch would be if there is a serious worry
> about the kind being changed to something other than 1, 2, or 4. But the
> fact that this is checked with an assert that can be optimized away negates
> that. The one-liner could be followed by
> assert(kind==1 || kind==2 || kind==4)
> which would also serve to remind the reader of the possibilities. You could
> even follow the formula with /* 4, 6, or 10 */ I think you reverted too
> soon.
+1 to what Terry said here, although I would add a genuinely
explanatory comment that gives the calculation meaning:
/* For each character, allow for "\U" prefix and 2 hex digits per byte */
expandsize = 2 + 2 * kind;
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
