On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 October 2011 18:04, Ned Deily <n...@acm.org> wrote: > > Has anyone analyzed the current packages on PyPI to see how many provide > > binary distributions and in what format? > > A very quick and dirty check: > > dmg: 5 > rpm: 12 > msi: 23 > dumb: 132 > wininst: 364 > egg: 2570 > > That's number of packages with binary distributions in that format. > It's hard to be sure about egg distributions, as many of these could > be pure-python (there's no way I know, from the PyPI metadata, to > check this). > FYI, the egg filename will contain a distutils platform identifier (e.g. 'win32', 'macosx', 'linux', etc.) after the 'py2.x' tag if the egg is platform-specific. Otherwise, it's pure Python.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
