Would it make sense to not propagate the signal in one case (e.g. SIGUSR1), i.e. just display the traceback in this case?
Georg Am 13.07.2011 23:49, schrieb victor.stinner: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30f91fbfc8b3 > changeset: 71315:30f91fbfc8b3 > user: Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> > date: Wed Jul 13 23:47:21 2011 +0200 > summary: > Issue #12550: regrtest displays the Python traceback on SIGALRM or SIGUSR1 > > files: > Lib/test/regrtest.py | 12 +++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/Lib/test/regrtest.py b/Lib/test/regrtest.py > --- a/Lib/test/regrtest.py > +++ b/Lib/test/regrtest.py > @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ > import platform > import random > import re > +import signal > import sys > import sysconfig > import tempfile > @@ -266,9 +267,18 @@ > on the command line. > """ > > - # Display the Python traceback fatal errors (e.g. segfault) > + # Display the Python traceback on fatal errors (e.g. segfault) > faulthandler.enable(all_threads=True) > > + # Display the Python traceback on SIGALRM or SIGUSR1 signal > + signals = [] > + if hasattr(signal, 'SIGALRM'): > + signals.append(signal.SIGALRM) > + if hasattr(signal, 'SIGUSR1'): > + signals.append(signal.SIGUSR1) > + for signum in signals: > + faulthandler.register(signum, chain=True) > + > replace_stdout() > > support.record_original_stdout(sys.stdout) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-checkins mailing list > python-check...@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
