On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: > On 06/30/2011 10:32 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> I'm not against adding this to svn, but please be sure these files don't leak >> into the tarballs should we need to cut another 2.5 or 2.6 release. I think >> that just means tweaking sandbox/release/release.py. > > The fact that releases might / will still be made from those branches > argues against including the file on them at all: they are in fact the > "canonical" repository locations, even if most of the work is done in hg > and patched into them.
Indeed, 2.5 and 2.6 should be left alone. +1 on adding such a file to the more recent branches that are handled in hg, though. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
