Le 31/05/2011 08:45, Tarek Ziadé a écrit : > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If no one objects, I'll promote Tools/scripts/pysetup3 to a top level >>> script that gets installed in scripts/ like 2to3, pydoc etc.. >>> >>> That way, people will be able to use it directly when installing, >>> removing projects, or studying what's installed >> Cool. >> >> Now I'm trying to remember if it was a list discussion or the language >> summit where you got the initial consensus on that approach... > The thread starts here: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104535.html > > The pysetup top-level script was mentioned here: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104581.html
A few other reasons that were not mentioned previously: - In 2.4, we can’t run “-m distutils2.run”, but a pysetup2.4 script works - It’s nice for users to have something shorter than “python3.3 -m packaging.run run sdist” (I like to take “make” as the ideal goal) - It sends a message that we care about packaging (personal opinion) Regards _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
