Guido van Rossum wrote:
Currently NaN is not violating any language rules -- it is just violating users' intuition, in a much worse way than Inf does.
If it's to be an official language non-rule (by which I mean that types are officially allowed to compare non-reflexively) then any code assuming that identity implies equality for arbitrary objects is broken and should be fixed. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
