On Oct 28, 2010, at 04:07 PM, l...@rmi.net wrote: >I hope 3.X use expands; in fact, I've bet the future of at >least one book on it. And even 1/4 of new users seems a >large enough subset to care about too. But one can't help >but wonder if most of the development community is focused >on some imaginary future user base, at the expense of the >much larger current user base. Then again, there's still >plenty of Fortran77 code out there, so...
Python 2 will live on for a long time. Other than promising to bug-fix maintain Python 2.7 for much longer than usual, which we've already done, what specifically should we do? A no-new-feature Python 2.8 doesn't make sense, and I'm not convinced that a new-feature Python 2.8 really helps folks who are stuck on Python 2 for whatever reason. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com