--- On Tue, 10/26/10, P.J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote:
> If all you really want this for is reloading, it would
> probably make more sense to simply modify the existing class
> and function objects using the reloaded values as a
> template, then save the modified classes and functions back
> to the module.
>
> Have you tried http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plone.reload
> or http://svn.python.org/projects/sandbox/trunk/xreload/xreload.py,
> or any other existing code reloaders, or tried extending
> them for your specific use case?
I've investigated several reloading frameworks, including the
ones you mentions as well as http://code.google.com/p/reimport/
and http://code.google.com/p/livecoding/.
The approach of using the gc to remap references seemed to
have the fewest overall limitations, but requiring C API changes
is a big downside. I'm going to have to do a more detailed
comparison of the features offered by each approach.
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, exar...@twistedmatrix.com <exar...@twistedmatrix.com>
wrote:
> This can be implemented with ctypes right now (I half did
> it several years ago).
>
> Jean-Paul
Is there a trick to doing it this way, or are you suggesting
building a ctypes wrapper for each C type in the Python
library, and then effectively reimplementing tp_traverse
in Python?
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
