On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:27, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Michael Foord > <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >> On 15/10/2010 08:22, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >>> >>> Brett Cannon writes: >>> >>> > As one of the co-authors of the PEP I say no. >>> >>> Procedural question: Doesn't authorship disqualify you from BDF1P, so >>> you can't pronounce? >> >> I think Brett meant co-authorship of the *moratorium* PEP (which is already >> accepted). > > That's the way I took it as well.
And that is the way to take it. =) > > The other factor here is that the moratorium was largely to help other > implementations get back up to speed with CPython as they dealt with > the transition to 3.x. Adding a new warning type isn't the kind of > moving target that something like PEP 380 would be. Exactly. This is especially true if the other VMs use warnings.py which will take care of all the details for them. -Brett > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
