On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:31, Daniel Stutzbach < dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > >> Of course, this is only true if the core developers *do* submit to the >> same rules. Is anyone proposing that current core committers have all their >> work reviewed before it is accepted? >> > > I think most would welcome (or at least tolerate ;) ) additional review of > their code. > > The hard part is encouraging contributors to find the time and motivation > to thoroughly review code that they aren't personally interested in (and > perhaps not even familiar with). > > -- > Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. > President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com/> > I definitely welcome additional, or in some cases, *any* review. Looking for reviews of Windows features/bugs sometimes equates to looking in a ghost town, but I have the self-inflicted problem of using Windows in the first place ;) Anyways, a big +1 to expanding review, especially incorporating something like Rietveld. Although I'm replying out of order, Barry's big response lays out a lot of good ideas that I think we can use.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
