Am 26.09.2010 12:54, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > [MvL] >>> I think it would be possible to have two versions of >>> _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED, one being, say, -5. >>> _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED_AND_KEEP_IT_THAT_WAY would be what you get >>> when you call PyObject_GC_UnTrack; the code to do automatic >>> tracking/untracking based on contents would use some other >>> new API (which would be non-public in 2.7.x). >> >> Looks like a promising idea! gcmodule.c's IS_TRACKED macro would have >> to change to check both states, and likewise the debug assert in >> visit_reachable(). > > Given the intent is to restore the 2.6 state, perhaps it is the > "UNTRACK_ALLOW_RETRACK" optimisation that should get the new special > value? Other than that, MvL's suggestion looks like a good idea.
It would work either way, of course. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
