2010/9/10 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:39 AM, amaury.forgeotdarc > <python-check...@python.org> wrote: >> There is no need to bump the PYC magic number: the new opcode is used >> for code that did not compile before. > > If the magic number doesn't change for 3.2, how will 3.1 know it can't > run pyc and pyo files containing these opcodes?
The magic number is already bumped since 3.1. However, it's true that the number should be bumped anyway for good measure. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
