On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:06:58 -0700 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > > In any case, here my results under a Linux system: > > > > $ ./python -m importlib.test.benchmark > > sys.modules [ 323782 326183 326667 ] best is 326667 > > Built-in module [ 33600 33693 33610 ] best is 33693 > > > > $ ./python -m importlib.test.benchmark -b > > sys.modules [ 1297640 1315366 1292283 ] best is 1315366 > > Built-in module [ 58180 57708 58057 ] best is 58180 > > And this is what might make evaluating importlib tough; while the > performance is 25% of what it is for import.c, being able to import > over 300,000 times/second is still damn fast.
Yes, that's very encouraging. I guess the final test would be to take something like Mercurial, and time e.g. "hg version" both with the builtin-import, and with importlib enabled as default import mechanism. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
