Am 13.07.2010 22:29, schrieb Brett Cannon: > Given how high traffic python-checkins is I don't consider that a > reasonable place to send follow-up and nor do I consider it the > responsibility of committers to monitor it. As you said earlier > this > *isn't* in our standard dev procedures and nor do I think it > should be. > If you can't find an email address then either python-comitters or > python-dev would be a better place to send feedback. > > > Maybe reply-to on the checkin messages could be set to python-dev. Not > sure if that's a mailman feature, though. > > I think this would be a good idea. It would be nice to have on-topic > traffic > here. :-) > > > Or python-committers since this is discussing code already checked in and thus > is somewhat committer-specific. This also has the perk of being easier to spot > (don't know about the rest of you but my python-committers filter makes those > emails much more obvious than python-dev traffic).
I think I've suggested this once, but it met some resistance IIRC (it supposedly made our development exclusive). I'm still +1 on the idea though, and +1 on python-committers. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
