On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:22 PM, geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:59:14 -0400 >> Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: >>> >>> Guido proposes to give someone interested in IDLE commit access, and >>> hopefully that will help in > this particular area. But, as I recall, at >>> the last language summit there was quite a bit of >>> discussion about how to address the broader issue of patches falling into a >>> black hole. Is >>> anybody working on it? >> >> I think the best way to "work on it" is to work on having more core >> developers, possibly with a more diverse range of interests. >> >>> (This seems to me like an area where a judicious application of PSF funds >>> might help; if every >>> single bug were actively triaged and responded to, even if it weren't >>> reviewed, and patch >>> contributors were directed to take specific steps to elicit a response or a >>> review, the fact that >>> patch reviews take a while might not be so bad.) >> >> The operative word being "judicious". It is not obvious who should get >> funded, and for what tasks. >> Some specific issues (like email in 3.x) are large enough that they can >> be the sole focus of a fund grant. But I'm not sure triaging can apply. > > I'm mulling over starting a monthly triage sprint under the auspices of > Jesse Noeller's PSF sponsored sprints in the hopes of making this a > little more fun. I'd appreciate comments on the idea. > > Geremy Condra >
Apologies, Jesse, I thought your name had an extra 'e' in it. Geremy Condra _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
