Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:17 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> Sounds reasonable. I ask because the various functions in runpy will >> also need to cover setting that value properly. > > Right. I'm looking at runpy now, but am less familiar with this code. Right > now I have anything executed with -m as setting __cached__ to None, which > seems right in the simple case because the -m <module> doesn't appear to get > byte compiled. Is that correct?
Yeah, the only time it uses byte-compiled files is if the original source is missing. Setting __cached__ to None for that case as well sounds like a reasonable starting point. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
