>> I'm +1 on adding a nice task queuing system, -1 on calling it by any
    >> other name.  ;-)

    Nick> As Guido said, let's call the nice task queuing system "futures"
    Nick> and point people wanting a full-power asynchronous process model
    Nick> to Twisted

Can this module at least be pushed down into a package?  I think
"concurrent" or "concurrency" were both suggested at one point.

Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to